Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited. Anti-Globalization in the Era of Trump. Joseph E. Stiglitz (Author, Columbia University). Sign up for the monthly New. Buy Globalization and Its Discontents New Ed by Joseph Stiglitz (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free delivery on. Globalization and Its Discontents has ratings and reviews. Renowned economist and Nobel Prize winner Joseph E. Stiglitz had a ringside seat for.

Author: Kigakazahn Zolorn
Country: Bulgaria
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 25 January 2015
Pages: 51
PDF File Size: 19.89 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.33 Mb
ISBN: 889-9-68961-234-3
Downloads: 67639
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Tojabei

But stigiltz biggest omission for me, is he looks at how the global south is hit hard by these policies, he doesn’t look at the flip side, that this is actually of benefit to the US he makes the point that it’s good for financial interests, but not how this benefits the US more broadly.

Perhaps, a World Bank bureaucrat can only be so acerbic towards his colleagues! A must read for anyone interested in development or international finance. This book focuses on 2 episodes in the ‘s: Business Week’s Michael J. It’s the least natural justice would require. Stiglitz believes the IMF and World Bank should be reformed, not dismantled—with a growing population, malaria and AIDS pandemics, and global environmental challenges, Keynes’ mandate for equitable growth is more urgent now than ever.

It’s a great and easy read. Perhaps the IMF was a bit slow in drawing that conclusion, but in my view Stiglitz gives it far too little credit for the initiative it finally did take, in Anne Krueger’s joeph, last Fall.

This is more like an extended, wide-ranging hallway conversation with an eminent professor. In many cases the Fund’s lending has indeed enabled countries to limit their cuts in public expenditure during crises, although one can of course discuss whether the scale should have been bigger.

In principle I share this position, but I have to admit that his and my concept of what is a “reasonably low” rate of inflation are pretty different: But of course the truth is that there never was a consensus that the set of policies he defines as characterizing the Washington Consensus-fiscal austerity, privatization, and market liberalization p.

He focuses mainly on a relatively small part of globalisation, which is the monetary policy pursued by the IMF, which is based around inflation targeting. There is a success when it is managed by national government by embracing their characteristics of each individual country; however, there is a failure when it is managed by international institutions such as IMF.

And stand better today than many of the countries who followed the IMF plans. Since the IMF loans primarily benefited foreigners and government officials, he argues it is unjust and onerous that citizens of developing nations be heavily taxed to pay them off.


John Maynard Keynes helped conceive of the IMF as a fund to help developing countries grow at full employment.

Stiglitz argues that when families and firms seek to buy too little compared to what the economy can produce, governments can fight recessions and depressions by using expansionary monetary and fiscal policies to spur the demand for goods and services.

Globalization and Its Discontents Revisited

discontent He does not charge it with taking orders from Wall Street, but he does point to incidents like Stanley Fischer’s move from the Number 2 position in the Fund to Citicorp to suggest that there can be potent incentives for the Fund management to pay heed to the interests of Big Finance, goobalisation well as pressures from the U. He may be on to something, but at the same time, here he is on the slippery slope towards the realm of conspiracy theories something he said in the beginning book he would not do.

Nowhere was jozeph willingness to take on new roles for which it lacked comparative advantage more evident than in the central responsibility it acquired for managing the transition in the former Communist economies. Significantly, there are desirable government interventions which, in principle, can improve upon the efficiency of the market. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.

If nothing else, it’s a good reminder to me to check my own confirmation bias.

Trade in goods is a substitute for the movement of people. In Latin America, many countries had governments that excelled in prolific spending, resulting in massive debts and budget deficits and horrific inflation. On top of that, since property rights were not yet well established, and because many of the new owners realized that future governments might reverse these privatizations, the new owners proceeded take as much money as they could squeeze out of the newly privatized companies abroad.

Globalization and Its Discontents by Joseph E. Stiglitz

Paperbackpages. Other Sites Joseph Stiglitz’s Website. The first time through was in If you are looking for a popular introduction to macroeconomics, look elsewhere. The right way is, for example, to liberalize trade slowly and without side-agreements like TRIPS ; to privatize carefully; and to recognize that there are myriad different forms of market economy, including the Asian way in which governments rely on markets but take an active role in creating, shaping, and guiding them p.

Published by Norton gpobalisation published Jan 14, Brian Moriarty rated it liked it. Making matters worse, the Russian government usually received very little, almost giving massive state assets away for free to friends. Overall, the successful countries have pursued a comprehensive approach to development.


Review of Globalization and its Discontents | PIIE

No, let me rephrase that: Social chaos is not just bad for society, it’s bad for the economy as businesses stay away from unstable countries and don’t invest in them. This book actually addresses the reality that hundreds of millions of people face in today’s economy especially when it comes to the developing countries Low wages, less rights, and less spending power create a world that is hostile to globalization. He criticizes its imperialistic ambitions, as displayed most recently in its insistence that it run the Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility a lending facility for poor countries, whose management requires expertise on development that has not traditionally been the IMF’s comparative advantage.

Meanwhile, the IMF urged cash-strapped countries to further privatize—in effect selling their assets at a fraction of their value to raise cash. Stiglitz acknowledges that the goals of the IMF, the goals of Globalization, are not inherently bad, and need not lead to the problems that we have seen. More generally, neoliberals, apparently worried about adverse incentive effects, have opposed welfare measures that would have protected the losers.

Please log in or register to continue.

Review of Globalization and its Discontents

Benefits for the average Russian citizen: Stiglitz thinks that this rapid privatization was a bad idea, and glohalisation basic economic and financial infrastructure and institutions should have been put in place first E.

He also points discontenrs “global governance without global government,” and suggests that we need to recognize the inequities of the “global economic architecture. As it happens, that is pretty much the intellectual position staked out by Stiglitz in this book, except that he doggedly refuses to recognize that many of the ideas that were widespread before were about as misguided as the market fundamentalist agenda that he attacks.

He himself describes how IMF intervenes way too much in the capital market even though it is self-professedly a firm believer in the self-sustaining rationality of the market, and he comments that the only way to explain this dissonance is to regard the IMF as having the interests of Wall Street in its agenda. The theories which guide the IMF’s policies are empirically flawed.

The IMF strongly advocated “shock therapy” in a rush to market economies, without first establishing institutions to protect the public and local commerce.