AMVIC License Number: Address: VEHICLE INFORMATION. Year: FITNESS ASSESSMENT. As required by Vehicle Inspection Regulation (A/R /). send a completed Manual Registration form (attached) to the Vehicle Safety Section. This new and improved Automotive & Light Truck Inspection Manual is available free of charge, from the AMVIC: Alberta Motor Vehicle Industry Council. MECHANICAL FITNESS ASSESSMENT As required by Vehicle Inspection Regulation (A/R /) Dealer: AMVIC License Number: Address: VEHICLE .

Author: Kat Goltikora
Country: Martinique
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Education
Published (Last): 21 July 2005
Pages: 410
PDF File Size: 8.30 Mb
ePub File Size: 2.8 Mb
ISBN: 386-8-53056-487-3
Downloads: 96215
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Goltilkis

An officer from AMVIC testified that the Mechanical Fitness Assessment is a condition precedent to sale of a used vehicle by a licensed dealer to a consumer. They should have an independent assessment done by their own mechanic. Whether this review by the NDP will lead to better results than did the previous amvicc reviews by the Progressive Conservative government remains to be seen.

That one-page form, which is available hereprovides spaces to input all of the information required by section 15 1.

December 6, at 4: This entry was posted in CriminalProvincial Court. The Mechanical Fitness Assessment is yet another disappointment in the operation of the troubled Alberta Motor Vehicle Industry Council AMVICwhich regulates motor vehicles, for their sale and repair, as well as the licensing of dealer and repair facilities in Alberta.

According to Judge Lamoureux: Why the year-old battery in this case was assessed as complying, and with what it was supposed to comply with, is not specified. Follow us on Twitter ABlawg. Member of the Alberta Bar.

You Can’t Rely on a Motor Vehicle’s Mechanical Fitness Assessment |

This post may be cited as: The Mechanical Fitness Assessment form does require an assessment of the components of the powertrain that Judge Lamoureux listed, but not the engine. A car buyer should not rely on that Assessment either.

According to Judge Lamoureux:. A month later, in Augustthe customer was moving and tried to drive the Mazda from her old home to her new home. The day after she bought the Mazda, the car would not start. Please click here for more information. However, she held that the used car dealer could not rely on the Mechanical Fitness Assessment for its opinion on roadworthiness because that Assessment did not speak to roadworthiness. The only assessment of the vehicle that was done before it was sold by The Fast Lane was the Mechanical Fitness Assessment at para 6.


More interestingly, as Charles Rusnell notes, the lawsuit makes a broader claim that Service Alberta failed to properly oversee AMVIC when it did not make sure that AMVIC corrected the serious deficiencies in its policies and operational conduct identified in previous government reviews.

Because of the peculiar disconnect between the Vehicle Inspection Regulation and inspetion Mechanical Assessment form, Judge Lamoureux determined that the Mechanical Fitness Assessment is not a representation that the engine and the powertrain of the vehicle are avmic or fit for the purpose of operating on a highway fotm para Proudly powered by WordPress.

There was a sudden bang, oil spilled all over the road and the engine quit. After unsuccessfully trying to give the car back to the Fast Lane, the customer parked the car.

About Jonnette Watson Hamilton B. And they should rely on a sales contract that avic liability under the Sale of Goods ActRSAc S-2section 16 2which would amvi imply a condition into the contract that the goods sold are reasonably fit for the particular purpose for which the goods are inspectionn. The review is expected to take three to four months and then Cuff will recommend what, if any, changes the province should make to AMVIC.

For used car dealers, the lesson to be learned from this case is that they should not make any representations about the roadworthiness of their used cars.

The Mazda was towed to her new home and never driven again; it does not start and is not driveable. Therefore, she assumed that she did not need to get an independent assessment.

A piece of metal was found in the engine block insoection an independent mechanic told the customer a new engine was needed. The battery was the original one and a new battery was needed. The problem which Judge Lamoureux pointed out is that the Vehicle Inspection Regulation does not set any standards for judging the powertrain components.

The Mechanical Fitness Assessment is completed by a certified journeyman technician and prepared for the dealer and, eventually, the buyer. The Vehicle Inspection Regulation and the Vehicle Equipment Regulation do not provide much in the way of protection for the buyer of an ordinary used vehicle not out-of-province and not salvage.


You Can’t Rely on a Motor Vehicle’s Mechanical Fitness Assessment

Just two weeks later, after driving about kilometers, the Mazda suddenly stopped and would not start again. And it was the latter representations that were misleading and deceptive and therefore contrary to section 6 4 a of the Fair Trading Act.

The Vehicle Inspection Regulation certainly does set standards or criteria for assessing many of the things listed on the form: Judge Lamoureux found that at the time of the sale the Mazda was not roadworthy and was not fit for the purpose for which it was intended at para 9.

The Fast Lane was found guilty not because it relied upon the Mechanical Fitness Assessment and, by giving it to the customer, induced her to rely on it as well.

For customers buying vehicles from used car dealers, they should not be taken in by the seeming comprehensiveness and meaningfulness of the Mechanical Fitness Certificate.

In Junethe customer who eventually purchased the Mazda, which hadkilometers on it, visually inspected the car and took it for a short test drive. The customer assumed that The Fast Lane had performed a vehicle inspection and took responsibility for ensuring the fitness of the vehicle. The current CEO has been removed and Cuff recommended the new CEO have reduced responsibilities, focused on administering the organization, with a new position of Registrar to take care of enforcing regulations.

See sections 4 to 83 of the Vehicle Inspection Regulation for the entire list of standards and criteria. It was found guilty of misleading and deceiving the customer by representing that the Mazda she bought was in roadworthy condition, but not guilty of the other two offences.