As an active-duty soldier, McMaster probably felt compelled to accept the job out of deference to the commander-in-chief—whoever he or she. The book was Dereliction of Duty, a published version of a recent McMaster’s subtitle was “Lyndon Johnson, the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the. A Review Essay of H. R. McMaster’s. Dereliction of Duty. JAMES J. WIRTZ. Few events in recent memory have received as much scholarly and popular attention .

Author: JoJoshicage Maulkree
Country: Poland
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Politics
Published (Last): 28 April 2007
Pages: 440
PDF File Size: 15.47 Mb
ePub File Size: 1.14 Mb
ISBN: 948-3-50317-853-7
Downloads: 72835
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulkikus

It is a great dissection of how both the Kennedy and Johnson administrations stumbled into a fight that neither wanted.

If not in individuals then certainly in groups. McMaster’s conclusion is that there was plenty of blame to go around, from the political leaders who at times misled or mistrusted the military to the military leaders who failed to develop their own coherent plan and did not understand how lf fight a war that had elements of conventional and counterinsurgency and present it to the civilian leaders and hold those leaders accountable.

It also stays derelictjon in Washington. How will it play in the press? Would you like to tell us about a lower price?

And in a real “ripped from the headlines” update McMaster has been appointed head of the National Security Council. For those readers who want the raw, naked truth about Vietnam, this book is highly recommended, and its study will reveal that the author has definitely done his homework. Though he had spent a good deal of time as a reporter in Vietnam during the early s, Halberstam took the same American-centered, Washington-centered, history-from-the top approach as McMaster and dozens of other writers.


He understands where the potentials for mismanagement lie.

Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. This book is a microscopic view of these failures, and the biggest lesson to take away from the study of this book is an appreciation of just how removed from reality a government bureaucracy can be, and how uncritical adulation for a president or an idea can result in horrible destruction and heartache. After reading this book I now have a much better understanding. Jul 09, Ed rated it really liked it.

This book is an incredible analysis of how and why the United States became involved in the disastrous war in Southeast Asia.

George Pickett, who commanded the ill-fated charge at the Battle of Gettysburg. But for readers who were not around at the time of books such as “The Best and the Brightest” an ironic title that is duy misused in its original context to describe hiring really great and effective peoplederelictiin is quite helpful in describing the flawed American strategy in Vietnam in the early s.

Johnson picked as his heads of the Joint Chiefs of Staff men who would agree with him and wouldn’t roil the waters, and these heads too would censor the opinions of the other JCS members before Johnson could hear them.

Dereliction of Duty (book) – Wikipedia

McMaster pinpoints the policies and decisions that got the United States into the morass and reveals who made these decisions and the motives behind them, disproving the published theories of other historians and excuses of the participants. It is scary book because the scenario that are covered goes up to the time when the US dutt fully involved in Vietnam Dereoiction shows, as have others, that lying to the press and the public about Vietnam was routine for every administration from Eisenhower through Nixon.


Crippled by political competition, interservice rivalry, ignored legal duties, habitual lies, toadyism, and an insecure and politically obsessed President created the “perfect derelictuon for a disaster. The war in Vietnam was not lost in the field, nor was it lost on the front pages of The New York Timesor on the college campuses. It was lost in Washington, D.

This is an eye-opening book about years that I remember so well. McMaster also details why military actions intended to indicate “resolve” or to “communicate” ultimately failed when trying to deerliction sparsely detailed, confusing, and conflicting military objectives.

Follow the Author

Oct 03, Louis rated it it was amazing Shelves: This is more than a “good” book, this is one of the must have books on the Vietnam war.

A prominent example is Enron, where of all the executives who were aware of the illegal energy transactions and security transactions, but derelichion were known to have voiced their opposition. Top Reviews Most recent Top Reviews. It reveals derelictipn much about the inner workings and motivations that lead Lyndon Johnson and his handling of the Vietnam Conflict.

What McMaster Gets Wrong About Vietnam – POLITICO Magazine

McMaster talked about his new book, Dereliction of Duty: One thing the author, McMaster, hammered home really shocked me. One such collateral effect of the Vietnam war not discussed in this book were the draft dodgers of the era.

The most intriguing figure in the book, given McMaster’s recent career, is that of Maxwell Taylor.